1 Upload documents
Multiple PDF and Word (.docx) files · proposals, RPPR progress reports, inTERP forms, Dimensions reports, MoUs. Files stay on your computer — nothing is uploaded.
Search the uploaded documents for specific foreign collaborators or institutions and check whether each is disclosed in a required location.
2 Principal Investigator & search terms
Summary
Compliance flags
Entities flagged as a CHIPS Act country of concern and/or a match on one of the 13 restricted-party lists, grouped by entity. Click the summary bar below to open the full detail — which list(s) matched, every document and page it was found in, and links to verify.
3 Results by search term
2 Principal Investigator
3 Proposals & 48-month window
The span below covers every uploaded proposal and inTERP disclosure, oldest to newest — nothing is ever excluded from the comparisons on this page. Dates are auto-detected — correct any that are wrong, and the comparison updates instantly. Documents older than the standard 48-month NSF disclosure look-back (counted back from the newest document) are tagged for context, not dropped.
Phase 1 Proposal-to-proposal comparison (federal proposals within 48 months)▾
Proposal alignment
How many collaborators each pair of proposals shares. The diagonal is each proposal's own count. Lower off-diagonal overlap = proposals that don't align.
Collaborator × proposal matrix ▾
Click a ✓ to open that proposal at the collaborator's page. A dash (—) means that proposal's collaborator table does not list them. A red row is a discrepancy — click it to see which proposals it's present in vs. missing from. An affiliation tagged LIST matches a restricted-party list — see the Restricted-Party List panel in Search mode for detail.
Phase 2 inTERP-to-proposal comparison (disclosure consistency)▾
One row per collaborator, aligned across proposals and inTERP versions — click a flagged (red/amber) row for the detail.
Phase 3 inTERP-to-inTERP comparison (consistency across the PI's own disclosure versions)▾
Compares the entities and countries the PI disclosed under "Scholarly Collaboration and Research with Foreign Entities" and "Outside Activity Information" across every inTERP version uploaded for them, flagging anything that disappears between versions or whose disclosed country changes.
A Affiliation discrepancies
The same collaborator listed with genuinely different institutions across documents (abbreviation/suffix variants of one institution are not flagged).
R What was extracted from each document ▾
For transparency — the raw collaborator entries pulled from each COA table / inTERP disclosure. Use this to spot anything mis-parsed.